Does the market economy ensure human rights?

  Given that the market economy does not respect borders or cultures but enter without "permission", and also tries to mold the thinking of the people ... be reliable a State in which a free market prevails care and welfare of its citizens?

      

        The order is guaranteed the freedom to some extent ... and what everything else as equality or social and legal justice? Although written the Declaration of Human Rights on paper the reality is far from the social ideology, and, even if states with the best intentions to safeguard individual rights of citizens, it is increasingly difficult to do, almost impossible to fulfill it, why?

     

       The reasons are endless for the many causes that may limit a State, but, inasmuch as the market economy is part of the life of every person and every entity is present there ... limiting the actions of the state and executions constitutional, policy changes by definition, in the way of understanding the offense and a thousand other ways to intervene society.

     

        That is why many ideals have been distorted in the absence of guarantees to preserve human rights, that is, in the eyes of world conflicts (caused by economic factors that push political action), social injustice and a number of factors is needed and that society feels the need to supply is enlivened with euphemisms such as property, individual independence and other guarantees that all they do is divert attention from fundamental rights. So it is impossible for the market economy ensures Human Rights and if it does is because it really is a farce ... mimicry.

        Change the ruling establishment? In everything there is a process ... a process that begins in thought ... a social process ... culture ... at least start thinking about that the better the welfare of all people, the better the real solidarity, progress both individually and in the society ... and think that is possible.

The new era of post-conflict in Colombia: Castro-Chavez-Santos vs. Hitlerism-fascist-Uribe

        Much can speculate on the political situation, or rather, on the new Colombian political scene once the respective peace processes, one with the FARC and the other with the ELN materialize. The armed conflict is a social cultural transformation, economic, political and whenever down to its lowest point if you want to call in some way to the intensity of the problems in society, this will generate some reassurance and confidence in the population not only from within but from outside Colombia abroad.

        The negotiated peace means the end of the armed conflict but not the end of hatred and resentment. The fact that recent governments have bequeathed ideological tendencies of the so-called right-wing and radical leftism comprises positions that are increasingly emphasizing the extent that the main leaders of the country irresponsibly arrecien differences through political speeches increasing population social tensions.

        Although the political passions of the mid-twentieth century, when the last great civil war in Colombia is presented, are not the same historical circumstances of the second decade of the century, the aftermath of the long armed conflict will be difficult to disappear. All remembering the terrible past that some were victims of some and the others who were victims of others.

        There will need to renew moderate extremist speeches speeches not only among political leaders but also among the population, so that the country remains divided but there is a convergence on center governments called moderate governments.

This will take time and as they say by strengthening democratic institutions, and only Castro-Chavez-Santos and Uribe-fascist-Hitlerism in the past will soon be a false trend, that is, as a fallacy of conflict a couple of leaders wanted to invent ... but that deep Colombian society has always considered dialogue and reconciliation as the best solution to differences.