THE FARCE OF NATURAL SELECTION

       Never in my life have I heard of the very concept of natural selection, what do they mean? What definition exists when speaking of natural or nature? Is nature a great monster or abstract thinker who thinks and acts on what composes it? Does nature know the times, the limits, the spaces and all the complexity that is required so that the selection of which so much is justified those that speak of it obtains a sufficient explanation on any anomaly or transformation of the nature?

       There is an obvious answer to all of the above, and it is that there is no natural selection, it is a farce, it is simply the deviation and de-virtualization of the exact sciences, since by being exact they do not manage to accommodate many of the details that nature requires and that it is necessary to explain. Then, it is when concepts that are not related to the exact sciences appear, in this way we are looking for a rapprochement or a connection between what is exact and what is not, ie it is as if a brick cannot accommodate itself to the corner of A work and for this it is necessary to fill it with a mixture of cement and water, or when to finalize a detail of some artistic work it is necessary to go to other methods in order to give it that touch-up that is needed.

       Of course, since the exact thing is equivalent to ninety-five percent (95%) of the total observation and study of nature and its phenomena, it is abused to force an explanation of that other five percent (5%). That it is necessary to give him that touch-up or filling that is needed in order to complete any scientific study, academic observation, theoretical or any of the argumentative forms developed by people who insist that nature is a kind of thinking entity that makes decisions As if to speak of natural selection.

       And how is it possible that the academic world, in most cases, approve such a mental and imaginary farce? Very surely, just as when you touch the picture or fill a work under construction it looks almost perfect, so much so that it is not even noticed. In the same way, the global explanation to the study of nature and its phenomena is almost perfect and does not notice that retouching or filling, then is satisfied the explanations, in fact, when it becomes impossible to give that retouch or fill To the easy and irresponsible argument that it is an enigma or a scientific mystery that remains to be studied.

       And the most terrible of all is that these farces and satisfactory explanations are hierarchized to stigmatize other explanations or arguments, also academic, as if they were priests of science who dare to point out whether the refutations that are made in The framework of the development of the academic disciplines and the thought of a society.