jueves, 26 de enero de 2017

NEOCONSERVADURISM AND NEOLIBERALISM The global confrontation of economic doctrines

The paradox of neo-conservatism and neoliberalism is based on the fact that the former follows the guidelines of economic protectionism, and the second is based on the free market, and the most surprising is that the former can be considered a kind of neocommunism, the ironies of life.

       And even more ironic is that since the mid-1980s (to say the closest in historical terms), it is precisely the small and medium-sized entrepreneurs who in the long run have been able to benefit from globalization, not only economic, but Also in the cultural aspect given the prevailing hyper connectivity in which the world today is.

       This is a rare competition for large oligopolies, holding companies and major multinationals. It is as if the social and doctrinal conflict between the medieval aristocracy and the group of so-called bourgeoisie survived. The political situation that has been happening in the United States, which is foreseen, will also happen in some European countries such as England, for example, has been rather a kind of civil war expressed at the polls.

       It may be a momentary reaction on the part of conservative societies (because even young people are conservative) in response to successive structural economic changes. It seems as if the history, in which groups of workers burned factories during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries as considered harmful to them and a serious danger to the future, a matter that was overcome at the time, was repeated, returning to the lane, harassing and Ancient concept of nationalism.

       Economic ideological clashes have been so radical that they have resulted in civil wars, revolutions, and conventional wars between nations. Perhaps the recoverable of the political phenomena that have occurred in recent years (we must also remember the so-called Arab Spring), is that in all social sectors has entered into a kind of reflections, what has been done, what is there, and what remains to be done.


       Be that as it may, I prefer that both neo-conservatism and neoliberalism be limited to a world-wide confrontation of economic doctrines, and that society expresses its anxiety and fears in the voting of any political election that is held, I prefer that to return the frightful memories of a war.

miércoles, 11 de enero de 2017

TRUMP'S ECONOMIC WAR HAS BEGUN

As a neo-communist, is the qualification that would fit Donald Trump. The closing of borders to a social sector of immigrants, increase of tariffs to imported products, reduction of taxes to big companies and multimillionaires with the hypothetical purpose that these entities and personages will grant a greater increase in the employment to the North Americans, are some Of the characteristics of the new (with dubious legitimacy by the subject of the Russian intervention in the elections) president of the USA.

       The diplomatic confrontation with the Chinese government, then with the Japanese government, and then with the Mexican government, is just the beginning of an economic war initiated by the neo-communist Trump, in addition, because in an unprecedented way, it seeks a certain closeness with the government Russian, historical enemies in the military and economic field. And like all war, there will be victories and defeats, and then the question is, who will be the most harmed?

       Paradoxically, neo-communism seeks to protect the interests of large holdings because simply globalization also benefits, save the proportions, medium and small entrepreneurs. Now, that Trump economic war will generate more employment in the US? Reflection is on the side effects of economic policies.


       Trump's negotiations with entrepreneurs are not such, they are either a kind of threat to business, or a kind of bribe to entrepreneurs. The long-term effect of this neocommunist, who always treats people as if they were the servants of their mansions, is only one. The economic devastation of the United States of America. For the sample a Russia, a North Korea, a Venezuela ... so many horrible things that have authoritarianism, or in the words of Hannah Arendt, when referring to totalitarianisms.