Who
is right? Most of the time in the academic field, who says to be right is
prepared to give the best arguments either for or against a particular issue
that is presented. Other times, in the political sphere, not only the arguments
are taken into account, but also the strength of the oratory that accompanies
it to defend some notion, but what happens when it comes to society?
When
it is the society that is deeply divided by an issue, public, academic and even
cultural spaces are filled to defend with arguments and with the force of
oratory the pros and cons of some topic, therefore, when all the front are
exhausted, apparently, the only alternative that remains is the path of
violence.
Violence
begins with a low intensity, and then, each day, increase more and more until
reaching a point of inflection in which violence will generate more violence so
that large-scale conflicts seem imminent. We must bear in mind, that in the
case of Venezuela, this issue is nothing more and nothing less than the maximum
political power that represents a president.
Sad
that Venezuelans are in a raw social conflict, because the issue touches all
areas of life in Venezuelan society. Faced with this situation, it is reality
as well as history, which can offer impartiality to solve this type of issues.
Undoubtedly
the reality contradicts the powers that hold this moment the official
government of Venezuela, why do Maduro and his generals insist on holding on to
power? The only viable and logical explanation is that it must be for economic
reasons, nothing more.
Therefore,
it is time for Venezuela to confront that other Venezuela, which is obstinate,
for fear of the future or anger, in continuing to support the regime. It
must be, definitely the last chapter towards freedom.
